Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38268 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49339 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2008 06:30:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2008 06:30:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.234 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.234 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.234] ([209.85.198.234:36827] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/96-06776-86806584 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:30:02 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so4867562rvb.23 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qwZMEjRjeru9zqSu6PXK44y8fcuUVWReUvM8I3k/hOQ=; b=OBgMxtnSSZdPWRQlUzLnXBHBx3Nk/0PoNWjwCGWpfRjCcyfIB9jerH3relv6p+iH7o O8WvLDCGl2wprV2zbAkv74O3nrdaDvpc8+wrE4+YuVlrmChbrwK3R5yVXvfk+7T40DFf 5hLROgsW9xq+ICDpfA72CEiur1BfS83o8thz4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=sT4uxzPH+TKjE+gbPXIOv3X6nYPcP1WtT4uaThyBnEbqctzTVuvWMbJrhmDaR5/4R7 2h9YyFyhxJuXbHRifeh3aHDmyGmaMK5DVcE9sb9sZcJwc479nqj+eEddAc3/FV0gNvz9 y6Jh7FV4/SWZGrevDEFxE3koAVMuj1Kv7HyYI= Received: by 10.141.69.1 with SMTP id w1mr3419914rvk.185.1213597798172; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.178.14 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:29:58 +0200 To: "Brian Moon" Cc: "Lester Caine" , "PHP internals" In-Reply-To: <4855D0F6.80707@dealnews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0497E5D4-1F92-4463-B98D-BE6B877B36B7@pooteeweet.org> <6C9C74CD-6271-44BD-B285-2B2BA66C0C56@pooteeweet.org> <4853EC48.6080307@lsces.co.uk> <4855D0F6.80707@dealnews.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] extensions status, to move to pecl or to drop From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Brian Moon wrote: > Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> You need it? Please help me to maintain and to provide reliable >> binaries for windows > > This statements makes it sound like extensions that do not build on Windows > should be removed. > That sounds insane to me. Please elaborate. No, the statement is about no one actually being able to maintain it, to solve possible issues or to answer questions about the code or how it works. Making any change a possible breakage. But the important point in my reply was my question :): >> You need it? Please help me to maintain (it) and to provide reliable >> binaries for windows The binary part is only a good side effect of having a maintained extension. > I must not understand what you are trying to say. I could care less if any of PHP > works on Windows. I am sure Richard feels the opposite. =) Now, to be honest, I don't care if 95% of our developers do not care if PHP does not work on Windows. 99% of them will be the first to ask to fix things as soon as users report issues or missing extensions. But what you say is a good example on how we may act. Why should we care for something we don't need? Because you need it? :) Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org