Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38213 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22230 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2008 14:34:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2008 14:34:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.238 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.238 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.238] ([209.85.198.238:46017] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/92-06776-5E6D3584 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:34:13 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so4547389rvb.23 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:34:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RrUkbYDTJXkXVQB/1s9tlRyy04UjzMCWCqz6+BqF2qQ=; b=vCC/y5PRCvhdLAjLoLiF0PB8MoFjVhiISAKaCsb85dw7/U3k1RAVfJRRvaaSYjpTYI eB11Whs2smjX+mXJV/uctt5BCCsAgf08wSd8AgvpeFnd/h8QRurkX2Ew3YBke1BjDD7a LVyUhSvN/2dwmt0OFN51XBwxhZP6Sz8BR/bfs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Z024nUL7o3f/qUUusKu7KZbnASZM+iGDGo2uOp4b3WUiyJG7HIb1n7Cq2kzlIHvhDG sNjZPadiG3NCdaWVH7yFmHUkj/HL/lDtBwSKkCsxiRCi/XAs6WtBhFiT4G9R1SUpnZ56 4/Azn6GGG/eNNbn4SNJ3QRiPBYCUVE9ste2rw= Received: by 10.141.202.12 with SMTP id e12mr2552085rvq.169.1213454052929; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.178.14 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:34:12 +0200 To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" Cc: internals In-Reply-To: <6C9C74CD-6271-44BD-B285-2B2BA66C0C56@pooteeweet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0497E5D4-1F92-4463-B98D-BE6B877B36B7@pooteeweet.org> <6C9C74CD-6271-44BD-B285-2B2BA66C0C56@pooteeweet.org> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] extensions status, to move to pecl or to drop From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") Hi Lukas, On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to > support them. If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why there is nobody taking care of the bugs or sending patches? That's why I doubt that these extensions are widely used. And if there is users, they are in controlled environments like dedicated servers or intranet and can then install them from PECL. If that makes you feel better, I can make releases in PECL and post something about their status. > Removing them is removing a key feature our user base experts > to find. Now for PHP6 I see this a bit differently, especially provided we > have decent support for these databases via PDO. I don't see them as key features, and I doubt the PDO support will be any better if no one actually care about them. It is even worst in the case of firebird as even the firebird author(s) clearly stated what they think about PDO and that they are not going to help (that's what I understand). Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org