Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38137 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73778 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2008 12:36:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2008 12:36:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=nlopess@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=nlopess@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.55.154.24 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: nlopess@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.55.154.24 relay4.ptmail.sapo.pt Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [212.55.154.24] ([212.55.154.24:49546] helo=sapo.pt) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F0/E9-15621-0357E484 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:36:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 15504 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2008 12:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sapo.pt) (10.134.37.165) by relay4 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2008 12:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11761 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2008 12:35:56 -0000 X-AntiVirus: PTMail-AV 0.3-0.92.0 X-Virus-Status: Clean (0.00399 seconds) Received: from unknown (HELO pc07654) (nunoplopes@sapo.pt@[82.155.73.165]) (envelope-sender ) by mta15 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jun 2008 12:35:56 -0000 Message-ID: To: "Dmitry Stogov" Cc: "PHP Internals List" , "Andi Gutmans" , "Stanislav Malyshev" References: <484E617D.6080508@zend.com> <484E722D.1090804@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <484E722D.1090804@zend.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:35:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18000 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Executor improvements From: nlopess@php.net ("Nuno Lopes") > Nuno Lopes wrote: >> Out of curiosity, what's the slowdown without fastcall? > > fastcall calling convention assumes passing parameters in registers > instead of pushing them on stack. yeah, I know. I was asking what's the slowdown that this patch introduces without the fastcall bits. I'm asking this because you are mixing two different things on the same patch. I was just curious on what's hidden in the patch. Nuno