Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38128 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17480 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2008 07:51:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2008 07:51:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:39129] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/40-15621-2823E484 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:51:31 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A35A6400C5; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:51:27 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <484E327B.8070602@daylessday.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:51:23 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: Felipe Pena , internals References: <028f01c8c973$32e0bb70$4401a8c0@foxbox> <484BFF5B.8010008@gravitonic.com> <030401c8c97f$a8ec09d0$4401a8c0@foxbox> <484C5533.4000004@gravitonic.com> <014f01c8ca59$ff770770$4401a8c0@foxbox> <1213037343.5402.21.camel@felipe> <01aa01c8ca94$3a920dc0$4401a8c0@foxbox> <484E2790.5050108@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <484E2790.5050108@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Focus on HEAD From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 10.06.2008 11:04, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Oh, and third - if nobody gets back to us by Friday over these patches >> we'll just commit :) Don't know about Felipe's larger corner, but I >> tested mine to death already. > > I think it would also be nice to tag it before the change, just in case. Good point, we always tag it before committing large patches. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal