Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38069 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48574 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 07:29:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 07:29:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=et@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=et@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 62.75.137.136 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: et@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.75.137.136 fuer-et.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [62.75.137.136] ([62.75.137.136:59644] helo=eve.fuer-et.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F5/23-25418-761A3484 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:29:45 -0400 Received: from lapalma.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (lapalma.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.165.195]) by eve.fuer-et.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C001115C842; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:29:40 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:29:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Hannes Magnusson" , "Stanislav Malyshev" References: <4842C9AF.6040803@zend.com> <4842DFB2.8050002@zend.com> <7f3ed2c30806011432l51044d1dx68abfa28e22ad671@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7f3ed2c30806011432l51044d1dx68abfa28e22ad671@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200806020929.39167.et@php.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] multiple use From: et@php.net (Stefan Walk) On Sunday 01 June 2008 23:32:58 Hannes Magnusson wrote: > I don't know what else I can say. You asked if someone had objections > and I replied stating my personal opinion that I find explicit use > statements in multiple lines more readable. > I don't really see the point in dropping three characters if you are > going to indent it just the same anyway, doesn't even safe you a > single keystroke.. > > -Hannes It seems to me you should seek out a proper editor :) It could (and should) do such indentation things for you automatically. Regards, Stefan