Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37992 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92984 invoked from network); 29 May 2008 11:10:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2008 11:10:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.226 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.226 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.226] ([209.85.198.226:59213] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BD/37-49427-F2F8E384 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:10:40 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so3835669rvb.23 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 04:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=rLY6KA3ztUm5z/PGNYrYXpA7JE2mj6tbwWQACj1wsXw=; b=EFFgXiYy7yrj3NMau3fbq0XCFJQTpaSrjfPjxOrZSLkqy17I2JJkdf1N0b4F4B0T4VGuBOYtz6ZPjfhFNC/ppjPyTnKgz1LsaMusFQL2+LSTtrIAhyOXwTUCkNKPYs4vkDrQQGIsil5ppa6iuHx3pyK6vS3KgZkf4ZvJiP7eNjg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YCX/ZDXlV2dDLl1xHXABEv3jXCTKo3dRECxJvjpqM9r+r/0Jwtn1OOlkSKz/OJsRg2kf/j+d4fyydpm877owe3Sn2C9e9HVGYJ248/BFE95VrwIbmrTyaev78UnjsvDnUWQebVpCDRXFvT60za7u8cyXI8sm/ucFobKPL9K8NFo= Received: by 10.140.165.21 with SMTP id n21mr1957750rve.97.1212059436416; Thu, 29 May 2008 04:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.123.13 with HTTP; Thu, 29 May 2008 04:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:10:36 +0200 To: "Derick Rethans" Cc: "Rasmus Lerdorf" , Mike , "Chris Stockton" , "Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0412F6FE505049F7901EAB8C61774839@pc> <97.F8.15519.1229C384@pb1.pair.com> <483C94EA.90507@zend.com> <483C95DD.6000006@sci.fi> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE01A53A06@us-ex1.zend.net> <1211994665.7621.39.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <483E31AE.6000104@lerdorf.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Short syntax for array literals [...] From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") hi Derick, On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > I'd have less issues with adding [] as the array() syntax if it was > something that PHP didn't support yet. But we're 12 years down the road > now and since arrays were introduced we've always used array(). I'd have less issues with our OO strictness and the numerous new fatal errors for non engine critical problems. But know what? no one is arguing about that anymore even if today's php is stricter than php/fi. (put some salt on this answer, it is meant to show how wrong is this argument). Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org