Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37956
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fmethod.com from 69.16.228.148 cause and error)
Message-ID: <235A5092989F44D081FD64011EB5F5DC@pc>
To: <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <0412F6FE505049F7901EAB8C61774839@pc> <483CFF33.6060302@lerdorf.com> <483D05B6.30804@daylessday.org> <200805281032.49016.et@php.net> <345fd5cd0805280147q73b46807vc9b6ad0778a96f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:34:26 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Short syntax for array literals [...]
From: sv_forums@fmethod.com ("Stan Vassilev | FM")


Hi,

No one said it's a matter of life and death. But is it only a matter of life 
and death improvements that should be considered for PHP?

The typical use case that benefits most from this is when a function accepts 
arrays as a means of structured/named/nested options, something I use a lot.

Compare verbosity and readability:

quoteInto('SELECT * FROM Table WHERE  x > ? and y < ?', array(10, 50));
vs:
quoteInto('SELECT * FROM Table WHERE  x > ? and y < ?', [10, 50]);

renderSomething(array('exclude' => array('a', 'b', 'c'), 'include' => 
array('d', 'e', 'f')));
vs:
renderSomething(['exclude' => ['a', 'b', 'c'], 'include' => ['d', 'e', 
'f']]);
or even vs:
renderSomething(['exclude' : ['a', 'b', 'c'], 'include' : ['d', 'e', 'f']]);

The key thing is, no one is requesting that array() be removed. Just that an 
obvious and commonly used shortcut is added. It's not confusing, it's not 
hard, JavaScript also has BOTH short and long syntax for arrays and objects:

var array = new Array();  -- same as -- var array = [];
var object = new Object(); -- same as -- var object = {};

And when people have both of those, guess which one they use in more than 
90% of the cases.

Regards,
Stan Vassilev

> Hello,
>
> As I always will say -1 to this.
>
> But I have a question, people here talk that this is very very useful in
> some cases. Can you please show others such cases so we can get your 
> point?
> I really want to know this super hyper cases, this syntax is mega useful.
>
> Regards, Dimitar
>