Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37912 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29749 invoked from network); 27 May 2008 02:45:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 May 2008 02:45:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danielc@analysisandsolutions.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danielc@analysisandsolutions.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain analysisandsolutions.com from 166.84.1.73 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danielc@analysisandsolutions.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 166.84.1.73 mail2.panix.com Received: from [166.84.1.73] ([166.84.1.73:64529] helo=mail2.panix.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DD/B2-12568-5D57B384 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 22:45:43 -0400 Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672F734814 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 22:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from analysis@localhost) by panix3.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id m4R2jdE29313 for internals@lists.php.net; Mon, 26 May 2008 22:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 22:45:39 -0400 To: PHP Internals List Message-ID: <20080527024539.GA22778@panix.com> References: <20080405132733.GA6531@panix.com> <20080525170701.GA5207@milch.schokokeks.org> <20080526003510.GA21086@panix.com> <1211812438.20630.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1211812438.20630.13.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] static classes (was: Overloading Clarifications) From: danielc@analysisandsolutions.com (Daniel Convissor) Hi Lars: On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:33:58PM +0200, Lars Strojny wrote: > > They might not have __get()/__set(), etc. pp. But at the end it is just > a clarification as static classes might not have non-static members > anyway. Ah. May I encourage you to edit the RFC to explicitly name which methods will exist and be prohibited? Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409