Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37889 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76835 invoked from network); 26 May 2008 10:20:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 May 2008 10:20:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.232 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.232 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.232] ([209.85.198.232:39494] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D7/E7-35134-3DE8A384 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 06:20:03 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2091151rvb.23 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 03:20:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dR6hOSDpFn40LelkWAyRPLNARQC84iM3+NI0V+zeQJw=; b=aAN4pGLn24lcPVHZa8m62FnxxiWQk7Bpnx0QnrIgBYNk1U78dcII962+dVN4ONfKfJ3ZznLcJsogLXpMon7vrgNzyKhwtJTZ5DqDEhxM91dZk+qkYW8e0uYmZaN5ftrWIsyQffkq1W4EFZ68C0eNcAJXAY/ssR4sEQcPnKHHqFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CEZsmzzvKrjrBB894xXSOLkQKcAS2koZsmgApEIMAbBx9IftrCNZnzVMPCOr3fcG/NlvEHBH3tKRn17Mz9n6QYhXzeIZO4a7MnZt8Vzzz1ui+5V9hxMOykrT6wxmtzQzxfY12Ih5oV6Rs+STWvFHigABgMMVKTO82BggzSBMCA0= Received: by 10.141.5.3 with SMTP id h3mr2090486rvi.138.1211797200916; Mon, 26 May 2008 03:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.123.13 with HTTP; Mon, 26 May 2008 03:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 12:20:00 +0200 To: "Derick Rethans" Cc: "Arvids Godjuks" , "Edward Z. Yang" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6F.D2.03677.29917384@pb1.pair.com> <9b3df6a50805240253o11da21e2k851d4363b59dbf7b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC doesn't work on Windows? From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2008, Arvids Godjuks wrote: > >> Use XCache instead - it's simple, fast and stable. APC is far more complex >> and unstable (is't like code for code) > > I've never found APC to be unstable. And I imagine that neither Yahoo or > facebook have issues with this. You might just be seeing a bug in an > extension that just gets more prone to show up when APC is activated. > > On top of that, as we've no idea who actually develops Xcache -- I just > see "phpxcache" -- I wouldn't want to put this on any sort of production > machine either. I simply can't trust an alias of one person over a group > of people that have shown to know a helluvalot about PHP's internals. The main problem here is to propose to use xyz when one is asking support for APC. It is like saying to use Python/Ruby/Java to anyone posting a bug or a question here, pointless. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org