Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37882
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=FmO1dYRk5isw0k7o2PEO177u+dTx6A8axGQ7gU2PHWMEpxEyofUVFSKIP7tV7ke4srO2ky0SusXIz+gy43IViEctBrvsofQWQ+nLkXEi7+tUVd7UcqShIdbvgO/EM5DkTRoHsMFyiTDMMgbPJ3Ye8YSF1IEK3gNI5CGhbCO5n0g=
Message-ID: <9b3df6a50805260137od7c4160s764e1b0e8d4f74b7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:37:34 +0300
To: "Edward Z. Yang" <edwardzyang@thewritingpot.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <DD.E9.21001.C593A384@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_5877_492191.1211791055452"
References: <6F.D2.03677.29917384@pb1.pair.com>
	 <9b3df6a50805240253o11da21e2k851d4363b59dbf7b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <DD.E9.21001.C593A384@pb1.pair.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC doesn't work on Windows?
From: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com ("Arvids Godjuks")

------=_Part_5877_492191.1211791055452
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I run Linux :)
There is no difference whatever it's APC or XCache - they do the same and
their speed's are identical, XCache is little faster but thouse are below
0.5-1 % differences. So i purpose you try XCache on Windows and see if it's
working fine. At least I haven't seen any complaints on XCache forum that it
doesn't work under Windows. And Xcache has admin page with all stats you
need to see what is happening inside it. It's site is
http://xcache.lighttpd.net/


2008/5/26 Edward Z. Yang <edwardzyang@thewritingpot.com>:

> Arvids Godjuks wrote:
> > Use XCache instead - it's simple, fast and stable. APC is far more
> complex
> > and unstable (is't like code for code)
>
> I wouldn't dare host a production website on a Windows website ;-). I'm
> much more interested in getting APC running for testing purposes; seeing
> how nicely my code plays with the opcode cache, whether or not a
> different include scheme would result in better performance, etc.
> Testing with XCache would be helpful (and I will certainly look into
> it), but APC is the industry standard and my first priority.
>
> --
>  Edward Z. Yang                        GnuPG: 0x869C48DA
>  HTML Purifier <http://htmlpurifier.org> Anti-XSS Filter
>  [[ 3FA8 E9A9 7385 B691 A6FC B3CB A933 BE7D 869C 48DA ]]
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

------=_Part_5877_492191.1211791055452--