Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37775 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72953 invoked from network); 21 May 2008 13:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 May 2008 13:25:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=steph@zend.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=steph@zend.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 64.97.136.152 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: steph@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.97.136.152 smtpout0152.sc1.he.tucows.com Solaris 8 (1) Received: from [64.97.136.152] ([64.97.136.152:29514] helo=n066.sc1.he.tucows.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AA/27-33305-BD224384 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 09:25:50 -0400 Received: from sc1-out08.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n066.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769F91801160404; Wed, 21 May 2008 13:25:29 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,29e815d6841323a3,2659b82809ca53c9,steph@zend.com,-,RULES_HIT:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:599:601:945:973:988:989:1155:1156:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1587:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2379:2393:2559:2562:2828:3027:3351:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4250:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:8660,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none, DNSBL:none,TSO:0 X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from foxbox (host86-137-246-48.range86-137.btcentralplus.com [86.137.246.48]) (Authenticated sender: steph.fox) by sc1-out08.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 13:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <013a01c8bb46$4ddaf840$4401a8c0@foxbox> Reply-To: "Steph Fox" To: "Olivier Hill" Cc: "internals" References: <012701c8bb44$68f8b880$4401a8c0@foxbox> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:26:39 +0100 Organization: Zend Technologies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: allow_call_pass_by_reference From: steph@zend.com ("Steph Fox") > Is it me, or the wiki post talks about param and return by ref? > > Return by ref is not related to call-time pass by ref, is it? See zend_compile.c. > Anyway, my opinion is clear on that one: shoot that dead cow. It's > been deprecated for years, and you should declare your function > prototypes with the param by ref anyway if you need it. Did you bother to read the proposal or did you just hit send? What exactly do you think the RFC is about? - Steph