Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37774 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71348 invoked from network); 21 May 2008 13:17:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 May 2008 13:17:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=olivier.hill@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=olivier.hill@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: olivier.hill@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.14.220.155 fg-out-1718.google.com Received: from [72.14.220.155] ([72.14.220.155:32480] helo=fg-out-1718.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 73/D6-33305-20124384 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 09:17:55 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2694545fgg.23 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 06:17:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=QHLbYUqD2Sap0eljdro6lEwSKfTHLe3YQo3Wn10NpbY=; b=xRYfUGXVZfRsqgwDECaiFQrItvCLcCHpxAx92/4dtiy0q2wfqDmaeS6u+P6hQS0IbCl6stRost3/p+xOdZSujM9k4YlDyxV60iEYFWXwwLZtXEoQM1GqjEPjmeJDBbzwth1fSCZ3Qy33zg3AP9vTLP7pJHRNYuO6qBLMWsbBA7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=S4wtZWR31W729MCKc0qAhhTElL9cW1VzYfI8ESI6R2UbJixNVV1m3GTQSnBkRoiDerDiyw4szQE4iy2E6Zl176MHALorUSa7c5IpHnDLIp0snSpWKlmO8l1SPM6ok87pn/awCjSljuwXDVV7GIkcn9Fjoui93vDeB716wQgqNsk= Received: by 10.82.163.13 with SMTP id l13mr50057bue.3.1211375870588; Wed, 21 May 2008 06:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.13 with HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 06:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:17:50 -0400 Sender: olivier.hill@gmail.com To: "Steph Fox" Cc: internals In-Reply-To: <012701c8bb44$68f8b880$4401a8c0@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <012701c8bb44$68f8b880$4401a8c0@foxbox> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5f1d28f571dad37b Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: allow_call_pass_by_reference From: ohill@php.net ("Olivier Hill") Hello Steph, Is it me, or the wiki post talks about param and return by ref? Return by ref is not related to call-time pass by ref, is it? Anyway, my opinion is clear on that one: shoot that dead cow. It's been deprecated for years, and you should declare your function prototypes with the param by ref anyway if you need it. Regards, Olivier On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Steph Fox wrote: > I looked into it again (and found things I didn't know before). This one's > bugging me enough that I braved the Wiki: