Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37680
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=M0UJf8QohmFWpwrSFF2v5+2EHYypldExEu25qHBiKg6sdLyQhaIytHCUfODvc58xQRatYbVKzGrTH15NC61bAAVbxmXIRp0ps0SS/M4p8XrqVB/qiyiH1YEFQbYI1lJzw4EeNCwmt3AiI4BVfOtdoeRZ4nMFF6O5hTvsJ5Y/3XQ=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540805160823o277d79afga91c4bc83de0432@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:23:39 +0200
To: "Gregory Beaver" <greg@chiaraquartet.net>
Cc: nrixham@gmail.com, "internals Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <482D9F66.4000802@chiaraquartet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <B3463B2BB0DD4F129EF274EA1DA1135F@pc> <482B9F96.7050908@gmail.com>
	 <482CE5F8.5000700@gmail.com> <4D.AE.00945.5066D284@pb1.pair.com>
	 <482D9F66.4000802@chiaraquartet.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 5.3 Namespace resolution rules suggestions
From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye")

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Ryan Panning wrote:
>>> Jessie Hernandez wrote:
>>>  > Hi Stan,
>>>  >
>>>  > I made a proposal and patch a few months ago...
>>>
>>> The developers should really take a serious look at this issue or it
>>> will come back to haunt them later. I'm not sure why no one seems
>>> comment on your proposal and patch. It seemed like a well thought-out
>>> and good proposal to me.
>>>
>>> I'm also wondering what happened to the namespace declaration change
>>> to brackets {}. I've downloaded the latest snap of 5.3 and that has
>>> not changed as of yet.
>>
>> is it too late to scrap all this and go with Java/AS3 style
>> base.package.class please?
>
> yes

Not saying that it is a good thing to do that but it is not too late
to change things.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org