Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37677 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11353 invoked from network); 16 May 2008 14:51:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 May 2008 14:51:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 38.99.98.18 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 38.99.98.18 beast.bluga.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [38.99.98.18] ([38.99.98.18:34075] helo=mail.bluga.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 45/CA-00945-16F9D284 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 10:51:13 -0400 Received: from mail.bluga.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC64DC100E3; Fri, 16 May 2008 07:51:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.106] (CPE-76-84-4-101.neb.res.rr.com [76.84.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC12C100B7; Fri, 16 May 2008 07:51:14 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <482D9F66.4000802@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:51:18 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nrixham@gmail.com CC: internals Mailing List References: <482B9F96.7050908@gmail.com> <482CE5F8.5000700@gmail.com> <4D.AE.00945.5066D284@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <4D.AE.00945.5066D284@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: 5.3 Namespace resolution rules suggestions From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Gregory Beaver) Nathan Rixham wrote: > Ryan Panning wrote: >> Jessie Hernandez wrote: >> > Hi Stan, >> > >> > I made a proposal and patch a few months ago... >> >> The developers should really take a serious look at this issue or it >> will come back to haunt them later. I'm not sure why no one seems >> comment on your proposal and patch. It seemed like a well thought-out >> and good proposal to me. >> >> I'm also wondering what happened to the namespace declaration change >> to brackets {}. I've downloaded the latest snap of 5.3 and that has >> not changed as of yet. > > is it too late to scrap all this and go with Java/AS3 style > base.package.class please? yes Greg