Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37572 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46652 invoked from network); 10 May 2008 12:41:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 May 2008 12:41:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars@strojny.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars@strojny.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net designates 78.46.69.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars@strojny.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 78.46.69.2 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [78.46.69.2] ([78.46.69.2:37293] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DE/92-26906-4E795284 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 08:41:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (xdsl-87-79-210-98.netcologne.de [::ffff:87.79.210.98]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,CAMELLIA256-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with esmtp; Sat, 10 May 2008 14:41:05 +0200 id 000000000000C006.00000000482597E1.000039FB To: Hector Santos Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4824EEAA.3080901@isdg.net> References: <4824219D.3070806@isdg.net> <4824EEAA.3080901@isdg.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 14:41:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1210423265.30073.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_milch.schokokeks.org-14843-1210423266-0001-2" X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Extension_Dir: Proposal to offer multi-directory DLL loading From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny) --=_milch.schokokeks.org-14843-1210423266-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Hector, Am Freitag, den 09.05.2008, 20:39 -0400 schrieb Hector Santos: [...] > Do you see a technical reason why this is not a good idea? Would it be > transparent enough that it would not cause issues with current > extensions? I would really love to see this. A use case I have in mind is extension development. If one has a continuous integration solution, the in-house developed module can be easily auto-deployed and live with system-wide default extensions. cu, Lars --=_milch.schokokeks.org-14843-1210423266-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJIJZfgAAoJECQPF+sCY6wHN8gP/2571V30Z0JPyTGItwFh4FaN 49MWRT4TpgmvABcJc38dDJ0BuPCl6VoXEsYukYrcx01X+EYNx4yUOaAYHc2UqGoU pBJyzvhICuoHTcEcCk7NAwLDJWDDqJlu34IswTd8pLdhRewJCPl+1jpXHAHOy/ni TAA6OW4uDdV9UWyX6m34oIDq9bkTRX4VNUSFvdb8V09+gfs7bUPVvs/WHaKlxFp0 zaxzrY3fcNjCAxH+H8VB8vMBbkDZC0Sykarb7hXhq0oH3RMxmopaCquUsNol/oih QIXC3t1Ewoy+zbmpbi65x5vLSLMqp05RDQ33Rij8KVvzopUiyiOVPLYmkZkTLtK/ ii695nkt86uZoGT/xyTGyzpFt/7dbgt4D4dhVC+9BaoITWFw9gTMNRgTj/V0H95F vmjsj1R20naZtTeigGyYYuwtZgVl2tX/S3o2s+XhzBsWwA+LQuSxYThXFEN03ssw luNhsPtIXjlIEap5cTtLtfLYewSjp7/h71/2watffNlnctxBr8m9uLUKsOMDcWhx UVDEtWNG7ufdZ5Y8jWCmybCHwZ/pR2nEMD2iVnwpo0OmCQvNYls9HJ7ASr6cg6ak HKti/Zp2HbNHGzSD2BaMj1AoQuQFyiB27xRmdA2/mq5xVVBGVfRPoqy+qjrrxaJ5 0q0k9twWZc8AOUzbNSdH =Zslz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_milch.schokokeks.org-14843-1210423266-0001-2--