Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37453 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67812 invoked from network); 5 May 2008 08:47:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 May 2008 08:47:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:46868] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/85-40102-9B9CE184 for ; Mon, 05 May 2008 04:47:54 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEED6400F2; Mon, 5 May 2008 12:47:50 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <481EC9AF.5010308@daylessday.org> Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 12:47:43 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomas Kuliavas CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <4BD5A050-02F2-46BD-B867-FA8CA12FF1BD@macvicar.net> <48988.78.61.224.253.1209918881.nsm@avilys.eik.lt> <481EBC7C.2040806@daylessday.org> <45147.78.61.224.253.1209975400.nsm@avilys.eik.lt> <481EC76A.4000703@daylessday.org> <42792.78.61.224.253.1209977064.nsm@avilys.eik.lt> In-Reply-To: <42792.78.61.224.253.1209977064.nsm@avilys.eik.lt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Removal of unicode_semantics From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 05.05.2008 12:44, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>> PHP4, PHP5 and PHP6 unicode_semantics = off work same way. >> >> No, they do not work in the same way. >> I.e. we were trying to make PHP5 work in the same way PHP4 did as much as >> we could, but that's not always possible. > > In my case they do. This means your case is very simple and you have nothing to worry about. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal