Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37399 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41777 invoked from network); 2 May 2008 10:04:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 May 2008 10:04:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:44442] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/39-24190-727EA184 for ; Fri, 02 May 2008 06:04:24 -0400 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (126-158.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.158.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AED11F8FF; Fri, 2 May 2008 12:04:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 12:03:52 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <154261733.20080502120352@marcus-boerger.de> To: Antony Dovgal , Johannes Schlueter CC: Lars Strojny , Sam Barrow , Stanislav Malyshev , In-Reply-To: <4818C6EB.7080309@daylessday.org> References: <1209574661.19653.5.camel@sbarrow-desktop> <4818A661.5000902@zend.com> <1209575139.19653.8.camel@sbarrow-desktop> <1209583027.3784.23.camel@localhost> <4818C6EB.7080309@daylessday.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling a class constructor From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Antony, Johannes, seeing this thread I agree. So that makes the list: PCRE, Reflection, SPL. Johannes? Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:22:19 PM, you wrote: > On 30.04.2008 23:17, Lars Strojny wrote: >> Hi all, esp. Johannes, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 30.04.2008, 13:05 -0400 schrieb Sam Barrow: >> [...] >>> Still, that just seems unnecessary, I usually compile without the >>> reflection stuff because i never use it. I'd like to be able to use this >>> like call_user_func, I'm pretty much doing the same thing. >> >> Oh, good hint. As the we already have hard enabling changes (SPL, PCRE) >> in 5.3, shouldn't we force enabling reflections? > Yes, I believe a feature like this should be always enabled, > as it's actually a part of the language/engine. > -- > Wbr, > Antony Dovgal Best regards, Marcus