Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37302 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25384 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2008 15:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Apr 2008 15:50:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.184.238 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.238 wr-out-0506.google.com Received: from [64.233.184.238] ([64.233.184.238:38922] helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BA/66-26601-DD347184 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:50:54 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so70750wri.2 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:50:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8hwI3bur9xGWUEFY/UXGdvCi7orjX0X2q2K9PeEPSNQ=; b=JMZR8FUJXn33rQByYzyRriR8MhV+HQEagY/fgOCu/VB5fMDufTUEr+XxwtrhFeaOadeL4dp0k7g9M2Tn0P0NJxnoDcBxjdS9t/aNG/Ou7r9zfJBmaJR41GI/Lsq9wIXReKcT+o+d0/MdRBFzoKayKMZxruFG3VHgrUg5Sll91ek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uC9j4Rb2E3wDealzllUtLcsH3xpxHBIFPAFMp+aSsaIQx2OO9d6nBSDifkkfV9duPrJSEhE8lPto4JWDIbca7BwGSFRLJoQR7NdsqTpxosak1/2P7F1BjNzlKdt6r8fUkBRDyK8KXcSVndTxJwvLefLdVoyMqw/WOxPOTXtqH+4= Received: by 10.140.88.11 with SMTP id l11mr3903775rvb.237.1209484250022; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.123.13 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:50:49 +0200 To: "Sam Barrow" Cc: "Nathan Nobbe" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=" , "Alain Williams" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1209483613.3257.12.camel@sbarrow-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1209137410.6642.9.camel@sbarrow-desktop> <7dd2dc0b0804251224s750679acn169637efbd8653fa@mail.gmail.com> <1209151505.20639.25.camel@sbarrow-desktop> <20080425231305.GC14490@mint.phcomp.co.uk> <9484717D-2EC6-44FF-93C8-1A9911294AF6@bitxtender.com> <7dd2dc0b0804261524l22237b58tfb9d0a341ab77233@mail.gmail.com> <1209482524.3257.9.camel@sbarrow-desktop> <1209483613.3257.12.camel@sbarrow-desktop> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Return type hinting patch From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Sam Barrow wrote: > Mine uses less code to accomplish the same thing, doesn't introduce new > tokens, and has an easier syntax. Ok, sorry to have tried to get this feature in. I do think that going down the way you choosed right now is the best way to forget this feature forever. > I'm still working on it, but I can > give an update in a couple days. I just wanted to see what people > thought about the implementation aspect of it. The RFC system was proposed exactly for one reason: to avoid dozen pf repetitive discussions about the same topic raised every twp weeks on internals. But you seem to completely miss it. Sorry to have interfered in this thread, Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org