Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37185 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56446 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2008 18:59:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Apr 2008 18:59:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.243.58.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.163 mail4.netbeat.de Received: from [83.243.58.163] ([83.243.58.163:42389] helo=mail4.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 73/C9-09668-6953E084 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:59:35 -0400 Received: (qmail 23924 invoked by uid 507); 22 Apr 2008 18:59:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.102?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@82.135.66.180) by mail4.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 22 Apr 2008 18:59:25 -0000 To: "\"Daniel Brown\"" Cc: PHP Internals List In-Reply-To: References: <1208818383.17979.30.camel@goldfinger> <1208884399.17979.49.camel@goldfinger> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:59:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1208890765.17979.54.camel@goldfinger> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Welcome GSoC students! From: johannes@php.net (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:23 -0400, "Daniel Brown" wrote: > Of interesting note: the list rejected my earlier (second) reply > to your message, Johannes. It claimed the Google BlogSpot URL was a > SPAMMY URL. > looks like the same happened to my mail - while I didn't get any response :-) For all: We published around 16 ideas on the wiki (didn't count them) but we were open for other ideas, too. We got quite a few proposals with some "favorite" ideas, I'm not sure what Google thinks about publishing detailed numbers and stuff - some overall statistics can be found in Google's OpenSource blog: google-opensource dot blogspot dot com Maybe it works now :-) (and didn't I always say that Google was evil?) johannes