Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:37098 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34907 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2008 17:35:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Apr 2008 17:35:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.94.239.7 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.7 mail.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.94.239.7] ([82.94.239.7:43390] helo=mail.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/DB-05127-B4A87084 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:35:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3HHZ0JO008053; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:35:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:35:00 -0700 (PDT) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Felipe Pena cc: Paul Biggar , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1208445852.5366.31.camel@felipe> Message-ID: References: <46ccd1ab0804170742g142ed562t4f03339da549a820@mail.gmail.com> <1208445852.5366.31.camel@felipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-2109924947-1208453701=:25280" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Strict type hints (parameter and return value) From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-2109924947-1208453701=:25280 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Felipe Pena wrote: > Em Qui, 2008-04-17 =C3=A0s 17:17 +0200, Paul Biggar escreveu: > > Hi Felipe, > >=20 > > Thanks for making the change. This is much more consistent. It remains > > that there is no 'scalar' or 'numeric' hint. Are you planning on > > including them? >=20 > No, i'm not planning to do that. I don't think scalar is very useful, but I do think there is a case for=20 numeric. regards, Derick --=20 Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org --8323329-2109924947-1208453701=:25280--