Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31117 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2008 19:41:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Apr 2008 19:41:13 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.8.134.189 unknown Received: from [64.8.134.189] ([64.8.134.189:13980] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/71-23334-9DEBFF74 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:41:13 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net,Lukas Kahwe Smith Message-ID: <47FFBED6.7030505@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:41:10 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3DB282A4-13CF-4B6C-93B0-72E0D9419A50@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <3DB282A4-13CF-4B6C-93B0-72E0D9419A50@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 64.8.134.189 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 == PHP 6? From: rpanning@gmail.com (Ryan Panning) Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Native unicode is not big enough for you? > > regards, > Lukas If you're looking for good PR and reviews, no. I think if you have very limited new features, the people writing reviews are going to say PHP 6 doesn't have much new and not worth the upgrade. IMO Honestly, I think PHP 5.3 is worthy of being called PHP 6. There are certainly enough new features.