Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36809
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.162.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=dmEwRHTU92j7P0Ep/57iKEMC1xpi0TahU80Bo2POc7rsO+m9EpccO/Ux+fUi6zs4hf0KdkQ3ytFYA4rgNBBTtDAFeT2XNy5D3uxDemN1/+Peg5k7x+CVfMJm4dbIdlN6Nr+Z9lZfZiaYhE13qrSx23eFVxpJYqrwUV022bxR/KM=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540804041233l5e9f9b9cn88ef9bdef89123e1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:33:18 +0200
To: "Stanislav Malyshev" <stas@zend.com>
Cc: "Lester Caine" <lester@lsces.co.uk>, 
	"PHP internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <47F68136.8040908@zend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <47F463F0.4030407@zend.com> <47F47360.8040606@lsces.co.uk>
	 <47F560E4.7060609@zend.com> <47F5DC3D.6090302@lsces.co.uk>
	 <47F677D9.4070804@zend.com>
	 <fe05d1540804041207o603e8d1cu149e83149471a2a1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47F68136.8040908@zend.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] intl naming
From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye")

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>
> > Yes, please tell us your "long" term plan/roadmap/todo, what is the
> > remaining work in intl and unicode, in php6 (from a ICU integration
> > point of view). We have a wonderful tool to document such tasks very
> > efficiently at http://wiki.php.net. Doing so may help you to do not be
> > "out of resources" and to get contributions from the PHP community
> > directly.
> >
>
>  It's a good idea, but I want to deal with this release first. I will do it,
> but a bit later.

I really have hard time to understand the "everything after 1.0.0".
That makes little sense to me. As I can understand the commercial
needs behind it, I can't think of going stable while there is still
issues to be solved prior this kind a release. Especially as BC won't
be broken afterwards.

It is also amazing to systematically ignore my comments about your off
list discussions (same in Andi's reply).

Cheers.
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org