Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36769 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94882 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2008 17:22:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Apr 2008 17:22:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mls@pooteeweet.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mls@pooteeweet.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pooteeweet.org from 85.10.196.195 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mls@pooteeweet.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.10.196.195 serveforce1.backendmedia.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.10.196.195] ([85.10.196.195:35937] helo=serveforce1.backendmedia.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B7/F4-17876-1C0C3F74 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:22:10 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.151] (77-57-23-243.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.57.23.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by serveforce1.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5CC1224B8B for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <586F9651-0745-48AB-9943-0BCCD30E3C2D@pooteeweet.org> To: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:21:50 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-backendmedia-com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-backendmedia-com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-backendmedia-com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.134, required 6, AWL 0.03, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-backendmedia-com-MailScanner-From: mls@pooteeweet.org X-Spam-Status: No Subject: little "regulation" on competing/extending RFC's From: mls@pooteeweet.org (Lukas Kahwe Smith) Hi, I unilaterally put in a "regulation" in place on the wiki on how to =20 deal with competing/extending proposals, where the original RFC =20 creator and would be contributors cannot agree on how to integrate the =20= differences into the original RFC [1]. I already made a note of this =20 on the wiki and the first such dispute has adopted this =20 "regulation" [2]. However I realized, that I always said, that =20 decisions happen on the mailinglist and not on the wiki I want to =20 mention it here as well (and make any adjustments people feel are =20 necessary): "Note: An RFC page is effectively =93owned=94 by the person that created = =20 it. If you want to add changes, get permission by the creator. If no =20 agreement can be found, the only course of action is to create a =20 competing RFC. In this case the old RFC page will be modified to =20 become an intermediate page that points to all the competing RFC's." regards, Lukas [1] http://wiki.php.net/rfc [2] http://wiki.php.net/rfc/peclversioning=