Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36711 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 549 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2008 15:10:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Mar 2008 15:10:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:44279] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/D2-05022-FFEF0F74 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:10:55 -0500 Received: from dhcp-172-28-202-217.zrh.corp.google.com (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A904211DAD0; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:10:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:10:52 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <94211010.20080331171052@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Steph Fox" CC: "internals" In-Reply-To: <00a601c8931e$c24cbc90$4001a8c0@foxbox> References: <00a601c8931e$c24cbc90$4001a8c0@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The Untouchables From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Steph, Monday, March 31, 2008, 1:02:46 PM, you wrote: > OK, so I just put in 140-something module updates... manually, grumble. I > (hopefully) avoided anything in core, whether that be PHP 4 or 5 - the way > we version core modules is going to need much more thought. > Apart from those, here's a list of the PECL extensions I can't or won't > touch. It seems that the CLA I hadn't spotted in pecl/sam was the *only* > reason I couldn't commit all 5000+ lines in a single shot back there, so I'm > a little bitter about these right now: > daffodildb (proprietary license) > ibm_db2 (IBM extension) > muscat (GPL'd) > mqseries (JAWA Management Software GmbH???) > pdo_ibm (IBM extension) > pdo_ids (IBM extension) > pdo_informix (IBM extension) > sam (CLA'd) > sdo (CLA'd IBM extension) > smbc (GPL'd) > tclink (LGPL'd) Did we not disallow GPL'd extensions in PECL? If not can we finally require OSI approved licenses only and disallow proprietary and GPL specifically? Best regards, Marcus