Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36623
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.200.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=k2EUeJvG1e3oPqobzNzbBXSrWWdqMh6t40vuNsL9XjeJTUuarRvY+ccrrbNGHub7bkfpVk7dYxFXapqo7BLJbkuHNWJhaw7PS0Qbqd4B725BOoHk6AvYFp9h+nATHQ33qOR4o450oW2foNH5MBJCu9Dg0Zst+gmDBoyEgO3q9eA=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540803271219h5642593ue389711004e6d0a4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:19:30 +0100
To: "George Wang" <gwang@litespeedtech.com>
Cc: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?=" <johannes@php.net>, 
	internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <47EBF155.901@litespeedtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <47E80EB9.60900@litespeedtech.com> <47E81136.3040308@zend.com>
	 <47E81315.4060601@lerdorf.com> <47E82351.6040004@litespeedtech.com>
	 <47EAAD1C.2050100@litespeedtech.com>
	 <1206574218.11056.24.camel@goldfinger>
	 <47EBF155.901@litespeedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard PHP distribution?
From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye")

Hi George,

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM, George Wang <gwang@litespeedtech.com> wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
>  Thank you for the quick reply.
>
>
>  > Well, the idea is that all PHP-specific code is licensed under the same
>  > license terms. PCRE and GD are external libraries which live outside
>  > PHP's context and which are simply bundled. That's why the clear
>  > preference there is PHP License.
>  >
>  OK, let me make some clarifications on this.
>  the main SAPI code, lsapi_main.c,  which is specific for PHP, has been
>  licensed under PHP license.
>  Other c source code are our generic LSAPI library, which will be used
>  for all third parties integrations, those files are licensed under BSD
>  license.
>
>  I don't mind dual license those code under both BSD and PHP license if
>  required as long as it won't prevent us from using the same code
>  somewhere else under BSD license.

I don't think it is necessary. If you like to bundle the LSAPI
library, it is perfectly fine to keep it under the BSD license.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org