Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36598
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.204.229 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ga2yymto4kylOxGSyMcg66SaGA4/GIoV9WXnWUehNHzVVvYB48k5PoHw8vLjISqQwb3htM4+WfrFrlMHT76NWMeu4XmS+lhfpCxbqS/1aAvEhG7PMd+m5LBGBchfzb2H+xX9+qgtXw7A2Up7pObQalQgDeMoR2fxo/LVfWIvgG8=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540803261735o6f9806ai623fa83a080167d4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:35:45 +0100
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?=" <johannes@php.net>
Cc: "Felipe Pena" <felipensp@gmail.com>, internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <1206576330.11056.44.camel@goldfinger>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1206536686.5423.13.camel@felipe>
	 <1206574472.11056.29.camel@goldfinger>
	 <fe05d1540803261648w2b7da737va04077d4ea68d18e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1206575656.11056.41.camel@goldfinger>
	 <fe05d1540803261701k423f3953g992bae165cc625d1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1206576330.11056.44.camel@goldfinger>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Backporting to 5_3
From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye")

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Johannes Schl=FCter <johannes@php.net> wro=
te:
>
>  On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 01:01 +0100, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
>  > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Johannes Schl=FCter <johannes@php.ne=
t> wrote:
>  > >
>  >
>  > >  And compile time JIT is fine as long as we don't have to care for
>  > >  encoding, right? So this change won't be needed in 5.3.
>  >
>  > Except when one sends a xxMB post that you are not expecting and will
>  > not use. But that has been so for years, too bad though, 5.3 is the
>  > perfect time for such thing.
>
>  which is handled by post_max_filesize and as long as we don't add error
>  handling it doesn't make a difference if that happens at compile- or
>  runtime.

Indeed it makes a difference. In one case it is always initialized, in
the other only if it is actually used (and not only if  a
_GET/_POST... exists in the script). That's a pretty big difference.

--=20
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org