Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75271 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2008 16:54:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Mar 2008 16:54:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=indeyets@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=indeyets@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.142.190 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: indeyets@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.142.190 ti-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.142.190] ([209.85.142.190:65238] helo=ti-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/6A-47041-2DF7AE74 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:54:44 -0500 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a21so1344175tia.17 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VY05MNdMRlGQDliCWA17hZDf1F8Sw7PoQD1SB0c4Rr4=; b=hwJD2tsL68Yj1OsZ3H+NTPeUU0h7G4LpePLxtWCTLtq4CvOjlToGp1x95ypccUAU3Vc1tZH0g0wMfFIwN9plvgrTeDC1xfBM7ZeQPoYWC+TOKVVQvxwiU0ba9Je/3voX57OIjZwuzeALMHmZhx2D8AXlJaGE7jm1uLP7LGuRUr8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jGVvQtYXWorTrcbFHuiytk2vgxCoNQb0q0OtiwDxqSPZ/DMUotfewUO6/SY7RSopIXOuRjiHQOsW9Rooxl1mJA8uVpH6BTqg8wazJaOW2wggDhWEKI7z0QkyCzWneNfaIxUEx5xyPtrQcVz5zCYcSIhVnf5twyNU9/J+FoXEY34= Received: by 10.150.200.8 with SMTP id x8mr169085ybf.11.1206550478280; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.57.12 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:54:38 +0300 To: RQuadling@googlemail.com Cc: "Felipe Pena" , "Lars Strojny" , "Robin Fernandes" , internals In-Reply-To: <10845a340803260945u7a49d991uac5d39be13cca988@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5a8807d10802050343r43742844we89366ec47b57f4b@mail.gmail.com> <46ccd1ab0803241816k413c7605p2c3fb9139afd8536@mail.gmail.com> <5a8807d10803250404o6fd33662wbbf3ff14d296cb2a@mail.gmail.com> <1206444907.11368.4.camel@localhost> <1206445347.5400.1.camel@felipe> <10845a340803260945u7a49d991uac5d39be13cca988@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inconsistencies when accessing protected members From: indeyets@gmail.com ("Alexey Zakhlestin") On 3/26/08, Richard Quadling wrote: > Shouldn't the instance be the limiting factor? it shouldn't public/protected/private are related to classes, not to objects. -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/