Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36513 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57544 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2008 18:15:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2008 18:15:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:37886] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/F5-28012-33149E74 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:15:17 -0500 Received: from dhcp-172-28-202-230.zrh.corp.google.com (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3197B11F31C; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:15:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:15:12 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1304417936.20080325191512@marcus-boerger.de> To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?David_Z=FClke?= CC: Christian Schneider , Dmitry Stogov , PHP Internals List In-Reply-To: References: <47E8D19C.6090608@zend.com> <505001029.20080325112757@marcus-boerger.de> <47E8D7FC.7020409@zend.com> <47E8FADA.1040501@cschneid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] re2c scanner issue From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello David, Tuesday, March 25, 2008, 2:22:31 PM, you wrote: > of course. how can you measure scanner performance with an opcode > cache on :p Note that Dmitry wrote that he did not isolate the scanner performance alone. I would assume that the bigger parts of listed speedups are based on other changes, going through NEWS you will find quite a bunch of changes that have impact on speed. And most of them apply whether tehre is an opcode cache or not. marcus > Am 25.03.2008 um 14:15 schrieb Christian Schneider: >> Dmitry Stogov wrote: >>> Drupal 20% faster >>> Qdig 2% faster >>> typo3 30% faster >>> wordpress 15% faster >>> xoops 10% faster >> >> Out of curiosity: I assume this is without an opcode cache? >> >> - Chris >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> Best regards, Marcus