Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36505 php.pecl.dev:5299
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.162.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Bcjt9NRIbr0LJlX3LCa/8AUJ2K7kHT12ARyMVo5U/RYi507WooYoF5DgCmtOPMzvYlie8DjcA95Mk6R9ta1b+w11Is7NYnHBMp+yRK7QUtQhaSeqpSOyjryVnC2UT0lqE9RLDJmz2OJ3JyRr/KzC2FY1h1UGC9sm/5q7LG0Lsn4=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540803250829t10c4b911nb8b5173936a53c10@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:29:41 +0100
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: pecl-dev@lists.php.net, internals <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <00f601c88e88$db036b70$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <00dc01c88c90$c34c5cc0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <01cf01c88dd9$b04e99e0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <fe05d1540803241123y66d99f27u2658609897eb5728@mail.gmail.com>
	 <024c01c88df2$2aadbb90$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <fe05d1540803241449m7fa40e7dvf9f8e66b2e325567@mail.gmail.com>
	 <029a01c88dfb$ec131380$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <fe05d1540803241707q264b43a9udbdc09c19999d1ac@mail.gmail.com>
	 <003801c88e15$76f3dd90$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <fe05d1540803250305w6fc4cb30kd109e21c5a40db2a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <00f601c88e88$db036b70$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PECL-DEV] About that PECL versioning thing
From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye")

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:

>  > I'm sorry if you taken any of my answers badly or personally, none of
>  > them was meant to hurt you or your ideas. It is a discussion about a
>  > RFC and I try to understand what you are asking or discussing. I also
>  > hardly try to stay on the topic.
>
>  It's simple. I want to see PECL modules versioned in a standard way. The
>  issues raised concerning this (not all of them on-list) have been:

Yes, and we have almost everything required to finalize the RFC. It
will obviously needs a transition period for all packages to get used
to these new versioning rules.

About the build themselves (and only the builds, versionning problem
is solved, almost), I really need to know what you are going to do. I
know that you will provide DLLs but I don't really know how, where and
from which sources. Am I right that all you want to do now is to
provide DLLs for PECL releases for each released PHP version? Or do
you want to do more than that right now?

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org