Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36479 php.pecl.dev:5295 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97128 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2008 10:07:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2008 10:07:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.187 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.187 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.187] ([209.85.198.187:33351] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/C0-27660-7FEC8E74 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:07:52 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so1929623rvb.23 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:07:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=w6KrP1SfHpqKmE9Vkp4DxHHT1yGq6cm2VnBOPpAJDps=; b=iuaUPCvl0P/A/KjwvE8x9UZLUJ0XJeqWhuXau6QCyB2PlgmAVKBBHtMNwXDC6/b3Jfh83A4r3fBty0thbLv0+tDprcJltqdBjNUJ4xCOJ13iZlwSWtlwpNmevfek+uGqAm0OuNWnxHK9HNyOVsJJMYaNbCDVuOUQ5Kgw+iEEvII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pPctD5aS19FRxYhsRyvHkTseJ9zfLL53FoLEYFz7LQLqHM1YzcEuT/hFxUR8MKXBjjByDa1r6V8gU334RnuOjDuBpkK40d79GFtgIEl1KTQy+lbBvBiJbAZhcUxchxkr0xeLZiDgdmTTKo1akhxuqWegwWUdsjUahMSmK9Zvj08= Received: by 10.141.26.18 with SMTP id d18mr3095834rvj.264.1206439669234; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.123.13 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:07:48 +0100 To: "Hartmut Holzgraefe" Cc: "Steph Fox" , internals , pecl-dev@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <47E8C98C.7030008@mysql.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <00dc01c88c90$c34c5cc0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <47E8C98C.7030008@mysql.com> Subject: Re: [PECL-DEV] About that PECL versioning thing From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > Steph Fox wrote: > > > I discovered tonight that I have full PECL karma, so the secondary > > question is: does anyone have any objection to my making all (or most... > > I'd leave the package.xml ones for now) PECL modules fit this versioning > > model? > > i'm fine with it, and i already changed pecl-gen / CodeGen_PECL > to create compliant code. I didn't roll a new release yet though > waiting for the final outcome of this ... I think you can go ahead with the #define PHP_[...]_VERSION part, we all agree on that already ( I will update the wiki later today). Not sure if the rest affects codegen, do you check the version format itself or do you realy on the pear installer for this task? Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org