Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36475
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:31:32 -0700
Message-ID: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE0165A861@us-ex1.zend.net>
Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard PHP distribution?
Thread-Index: AciODKn6UcDSxrTxTPqF/cJQVVKQ9gALIv7A
References: <47E80EB9.60900@litespeedtech.com> <fe05d1540803241709n77ae6569qa4a89436c2bbe14@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pierre Joye" <pierre.php@gmail.com>,
	"George Wang" <gwang@litespeedtech.com>
Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard PHP distribution?
From: andi@zend.com ("Andi Gutmans")

Litespeed !=3D lighttpd

In any case, we've always been pretty liberal about these kind of SAPI
extensions in order to ensure out-of-the-box experience for our users.
Esp. as litespeed are willing to support it and we have precedence of
Web servers which are far less common I really don't think there's a
good reason not to include it. It won't break other SAPI extensions...

Btw, is this a multi-threaded SAPI or is it a FastCGI replacement? (i.e.
multi-process). Just curious...
Andi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 5:09 PM
> To: George Wang
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard
> PHP distribution?
>=20
> Hi George,
>=20
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:27 PM, George Wang <gwang@litespeedtech.com>
> wrote:
>=20
> >  It has been over two years since the last time we wrote to the list
> to
> >  consider the inclusion of litespeed SAPI module in the stand PHP
> >  distribution. By that time, our code has been added to CVS
> repository
> >  under /pecl/litespeed, and I have been told that "if there is
enough
> >  independent user demand for it and we are comfortable with the
> quality
> >  of the code, it will go in."
>=20
> I'm not a user of litespeed (lighttpd here) but it is a relatively
> well known server in the "lite" category (cherokee, lighttpd & co). I
> see no reason to reject it as long as they maintain it, +1 here :)
>=20
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>=20
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php