Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36474 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9926 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2008 01:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2008 01:45:08 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 76.97.7.151 unknown Received: from [76.97.7.151] ([76.97.7.151:1037] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 33/A1-20329-32958E74 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:45:08 -0500 Message-ID: <33.A1.20329.32958E74@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:44:52 -0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1789567073.20080321223647@marcus-boerger.de> <1206221550.31721.4.camel@goldfinger> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Posted-By: 76.97.7.151 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Namespace syntax decision From: ramsey@php.net (Ben Ramsey) On 3/23/08 5:05 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Johannes Schlüter schrieb: >> I said in some previous post I won't like multiple namespaces per file >> using the 2nd syntax. So imo: either on ns per file and the 2nd syntax >> or allow multiple and use brackets. And then I prefer the latter. > > I second that emotion. > I'm aware that there's already been a lot of discussion on this already, but as one who's already begun programming prototype code with namespaces, I agree with Johannes and Sebastian here. +1 -- Ben Ramsey http://benramsey.com/