Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36407 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69823 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2008 20:14:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2008 20:14:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.117 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.117 us-mr1.zend.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [63.205.162.117] ([63.205.162.117:44881] helo=us-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 81/5D-10593-A1AB6E74 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:14:18 -0500 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com (us-ex1.zend.net [192.168.16.5]) by us-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C31FE123D; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.17.66] ([192.168.17.66]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:14:43 -0700 Message-ID: <47E6BA16.5090204@zend.com> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:14:14 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger Cc: internals@lists.php.net References: <1789567073.20080321223647@marcus-boerger.de> <7f3ed2c30803220400q600e7f9ei257ddd07fffba463@mail.gmail.com> <47E5B7A2.6020803@zend.com> <1117363424.20080323144906@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <1117363424.20080323144906@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2008 20:14:44.0028 (UTC) FILETIME=[889A57C0:01C88D22] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Namespace syntax decision From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > Well the history simply is that many people did not agree. And you simply For any decision there would be many people that disagree. But we have to end is somewhere and not rehash it endlessly. > are unhappy with the current state, so either convince them with technical > arguments or change the current state. Myself and others explained reason for this decision many times, with detailed technical arguments. I am unable to say something new on the matter, unless some new questions are asked. I don't know what else I can do to convince anybody who didn't listen to these arguments. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com