Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36368 php.pecl.dev:5248
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=VX5AmuH0rDLRB+vI8wlOjwiexhADCMrGi1OnJqxLKhQTB2eaNX5l3SxyDM9LoToM+GKkIu448+qvfJQqkdaiqS5NO9Zjsxv+I8t2pnbD+Cn/LGWa2PUu4E6ZETsuBCz11/0XDkA3xeZRm9qbb0KnNlQCeSODklZRhLPhzH5namI=
Message-ID: <7f3ed2c30803230501wc48cb3frda25564f59b32d06@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:01:09 +0100
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>, pecl-dev@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <00dc01c88c90$c34c5cc0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <00dc01c88c90$c34c5cc0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
Subject: Re: [PECL-DEV] About that PECL versioning thing
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com ("Hannes Magnusson")

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:
>  does anyone have any objection to the proposal at
>  http://wiki.php.net/rfc/peclversioning?

The first step in fixing the core<->pecl relationship? \o/

Looks good.
But what about extensions that are symlinked to core? Will they need
to update their version info during core release cycles?
It obviously shouldn't have a -dev version when distributed with PHP..
Is it up to the RM to hunt those extensions down and make sure the
version info is accurate?

-Hannes