Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36360 php.pecl.dev:5245 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99748 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2008 02:50:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2008 02:50:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=steph@zend.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=steph@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 64.97.136.145 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: steph@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.97.136.145 smtpout0145.sc1.he.tucows.com Solaris 8 (1) Received: from [64.97.136.145] ([64.97.136.145:8054] helo=n068.sc1.he.tucows.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5C/25-16027-675C5E74 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:50:31 -0500 Received: from sc1-out04.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769316E00F8DA56; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:50:28 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,9ebb5d56406f241d,48bca8184d8b1d36,steph@zend.com,-,RULES_HIT:152:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:967:973:988:989:1155:1156:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1587:1593:1594:1676:1711:1714:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2393:2525:2559:2563:2682:2685:2857:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3350:3622:3657:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:4250:5007:6119:6261:7653:7679:7875:7903,0,RBL:none, CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from foxbox (62-31-252-198.cable.ubr07.shef.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.252.198]) (Authenticated sender: steph.fox) by sc1-out04.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <00dc01c88c90$c34c5cc0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> Reply-To: "Steph Fox" To: "internals" , Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:51:14 -0000 Organization: Zend Technologies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: About that PECL versioning thing From: steph@zend.com ("Steph Fox") Hi all, Since I'm still awake at 3am... Aside from Pierre's arguments in favour of using package.xml to set the extension version (which 3 PECL extensions - two of them Pierre's - do at present), does anyone have any objection to the proposal at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/peclversioning? I discovered tonight that I have full PECL karma, so the secondary question is: does anyone have any objection to my making all (or most... I'd leave the package.xml ones for now) PECL modules fit this versioning model? - Steph