Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36330
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 81131 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2008 17:58:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 22 Mar 2008 17:58:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:58317] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 06/0E-16027-CC845E74 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:58:37 -0500
Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (72-216.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.1.216.72])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CEE11F04C;
	Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:58:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:58:03 +0100
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <248800647.20080322185803@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Ryan Panning <rpanning@gmail.com>
CC: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <70.7D.16027.DE645E74@pb1.pair.com>
References: <1789567073.20080321223647@marcus-boerger.de>  <47E43032.20507@chiaraquartet.net> <1206186368.5916.3.camel@pena>  <1404614933.20080322162915@marcus-boerger.de> <1206202656.10080.47.camel@localhost> <70.7D.16027.DE645E74@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Namespace syntax decision
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Ryan,

Saturday, March 22, 2008, 6:50:36 PM, you wrote:

> Lars Strojny wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Am Samstag, den 22.03.2008, 16:29 +0100 schrieb Marcus Boerger:
>> [...]
>>> looks pretty good to me. Let's see what other responses we get by late
>>> wedensday.
>> 
>> I like the current syntax and don't think it is confusing. So -1 for
>> changing it.
>> 
>> cu, Lars

> I'm also -1 on this one. If your namespace needs to be in brackets {} 
> then that means more indentation. Not that it's a huge deal but I like 
> to keep the indents to a minimum.

Who forces you to do indentation? Most C++ code that uses namespaces indeed
is not indented. And I see not reason it should. If it whould then the
namespaces with just a semicolon at the end would need the same indentation.

Best regards,
 Marcus