Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36310 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19037 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2008 00:29:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Mar 2008 00:29:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.190 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.190 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.190] ([209.85.198.190:28526] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 25/88-26785-FE254E74 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:29:37 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so968981rvb.23 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:29:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ajG9OaJb7yA+UlWWd0CyXhdrGbHNzuu6a2V3x0Gt3aM=; b=nYWy3s2WPqsdc+eOyQ22lPyG+312ocz6hWMiY57TdD7ovz2CtElfJWaH478gm8TLvGSKdMeUIP1D/cy/mz3dg3PD9RomR7qH1NBKbLZwivKFlgDjBDyP1hlumePiPMYsA113gmwp99zcVW5KYhkzbHUagF3va/BYpgnhDeA6r5g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L2+Mvv3qWy+4Le3lVCyG35VQhXKiWV1j7jvbz31Jrxapo92WV8FYOtaeFJL+kBmxz5C3rC2c1Ed9h5f3qc1VT1UkPQdvqaBKaAIv+HfaIg3JV+jU969duSSbeRVLglCyy2oSt7ZBCocmr3/KzIxMt+eqeVeYB6PhsZWx1Yep7uk= Received: by 10.141.43.5 with SMTP id v5mr1647964rvj.49.1206145773235; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.116.12 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:29:33 +0100 To: "Rasmus Lerdorf" Cc: "Elizabeth M Smith" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <47E450B1.9040604@lerdorf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47E3F714.60302@zend.com> <47E410C6.80605@sci.fi> <47E4146A.8010409@zend.com> <47E41765.4080007@zend.com> <111239762.20080321212310@marcus-boerger.de> <47E41C9F.4040105@zend.com> <935033306.20080321223836@marcus-boerger.de> <68.F2.26785.55E24E74@pb1.pair.com> <47E450B1.9040604@lerdorf.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") Hi Rasmus, On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Will actually do about the same thing in the sense that the top-level > script can run with short_open_tag turned off and the main.php script > can run with short_open_tag enabled. The first version requires that > you configure your Apache to enable short_open_tag for the templates/ > directory, while the second lets you do it from the PHP level. The > first suffers from being extremely slow and it isn't obvious that > scripts in templates/ operate under different rules. The second is much > faster and it is more obvious what is happening. as a conclusion from my point of view, I don't think it's possible to bring anything new to this dicsussion: -1 for the patch (revert) +1 to actually deprecate short tags +1 to remove them in HEAD That's not asked but let clear this problem once and for all. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org