Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36273 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45349 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2008 20:13:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2008 20:13:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:39708] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6D/D8-26785-EE614E74 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:13:36 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (112-159.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.159.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D2A11EFD5; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:13:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:10:34 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <961683605.20080321211034@marcus-boerger.de> To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: Pierre Joye , jani.taskinen@iki.fi, PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <47E414FD.4040608@zend.com> References: <47E3F714.60302@zend.com> <883216194.20080321193140@marcus-boerger.de> <47E40848.1060103@zend.com> <47E40C3F.8040601@sci.fi> <47E40E6E.5030103@zend.com> <47E414FD.4040608@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Stanislav, Friday, March 21, 2008, 9:05:17 PM, you wrote: >> The main reason is that they are not valid processing instructions. >> See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-pi > Great, they are also probably not valid S-expressions and not valid > phrases in Mandarin. Why they are bad because of that? Is there any > requirement for them to be? The argument being? Best regards, Marcus