Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36246 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61373 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2008 17:57:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2008 17:57:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:31987] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2D/76-26785-A17F3E74 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:57:47 -0500 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:58:10 +0200 Received: from [192.168.16.115] ([192.168.16.115]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:58:07 -0700 Message-ID: <47E3F714.60302@zend.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:57:40 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'PHP Internals' Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2008 17:58:07.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E228210:01C88B7D] Subject: short_open_tag From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! Forwarding this mail again since apparently many people missed it previously. Please discuss. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: short_open_tag Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:45:59 -0800 From: Stanislav Malyshev Hi! I wonder - is there a reason why short_open_tag config value is per-dir and not PHP_INI_ALL? After all, as I understand, it is private for each compilation. So suppose you preferred it generally off (you do XML, etc.) but you have some files in your app where you want it on - would there be any problem anywhere if it were INI_ALL? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com