Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36227 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84417 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2008 21:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Mar 2008 21:28:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sublick@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sublick@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.170.185 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sublick@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.170.185 rn-out-0910.google.com Received: from [64.233.170.185] ([64.233.170.185:36625] helo=rn-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 88/FA-09437-407D2E74 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:28:37 -0500 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id v46so1011364rnb.15 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:28:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=r45K5kKvcFIjCbXtfEehDaJcjpK+cPYDCBpeyBiFVPo=; b=QdMlpohPJDbJ8/XafebEG7G8zriAFjhS4MXq4g80LN9uVVQC352ZkON9uDGOx6JHyucP4vxgPR0cPup7fLFQTQJRBgbje3+3Eb58y0RO2mNQqQTPeqna4CPx3MwasQERf8cbWQUVi6fivgBh8ZB817MTAxK78j8774iLs8tyPeg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jZER4zHKl7jWuec+TiMQrh8FM1vDPkTvQhJVWlj1NnUgVpjbFIQCDvZUb+XELhDDthlFy6LFgr1kuwMZ/CrhjarHBnRtDhus94IHIc7bhsjdeRdj42SQIl/CZg8CT1qq+jLiXD7zWXcobu8DewkNcyEHqblt088f2aFKJGzpJdY= Received: by 10.142.224.5 with SMTP id w5mr1859999wfg.215.1206048513611; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.241.8 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:28:33 -0700 To: "PHP Internals List" In-Reply-To: <47E2AAFC.8080900@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d7b8c130803122114i1062a961t99c49c06867803e3@mail.gmail.com> <8d7b8c130803130648w112c4184l35482341bfeb7a9e@mail.gmail.com> <8d7b8c130803181155i78702123o8ab91e047bf54132@mail.gmail.com> <8d7b8c130803192014n263a92fcu913fb791e1f9e7c9@mail.gmail.com> <47E2AAFC.8080900@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] LSB - new patches for forward_static_call and parent:: forwarding (was: 5.3 Release Planning) From: sublick@gmail.com ("Joseph North") Could I just get a confirmation that the parent forwarding patch has been looked at? It seems to me that the patch makes parent:: work as one would expect when extending static methods, and would not cause any backwards compatibility problems. Why is add a function preferred? Thanks, Joseph North On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > To answer Stanislav's question yes, the forward_static_call patch will > > suffice my concerns with the current implementation. You did mention that > > you weren't a big fan of the name, I am not particularly attached to it > > either. If you (or anyone else) has better name in mind I would be happy to > > change it. > > Great. Could you just add a couple of tests - to both verify it works > and illustrate the idea? Then I guess it'll be ready to commit. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com > > -- > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >