Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36213 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52457 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2008 03:14:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Mar 2008 03:14:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=m@digitalsandwich.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=m@digitalsandwich.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain digitalsandwich.com from 72.14.220.152 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: m@digitalsandwich.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.14.220.152 fg-out-1718.google.com Received: from [72.14.220.152] ([72.14.220.152:35995] helo=fg-out-1718.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B7/20-51058-EA6D1E74 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:14:54 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so653129fge.23 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr545523fge.68.1205982890862; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.97.10 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d7b8c130803192014n263a92fcu913fb791e1f9e7c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:14:50 -0700 To: "Etienne Kneuss" Cc: "PHP Internals List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10873_25034849.1205982890851" References: <8d7b8c130803122114i1062a961t99c49c06867803e3@mail.gmail.com> <8d7b8c130803130648w112c4184l35482341bfeb7a9e@mail.gmail.com> <8d7b8c130803181155i78702123o8ab91e047bf54132@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] LSB - new patches for forward_static_call and parent:: forwarding (was: 5.3 Release Planning) From: m@digitalsandwich.com ("Mike Lively") ------=_Part_10873_25034849.1205982890851 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote: > Hello, > > the forward_static_call looks like a decent non-intrusive solution, > and your patch looks > good from what I can tell! I guess you should commit it so it can be > documented and all. If by 'you' you mean me...I can't. I don't have any cvs karma, or an account for that matter. I am going to go ahead and write the tests and add them to a new copy of the patch. Then it will be ready for someone to commit. To answer Stanislav's question yes, the forward_static_call patch will suffice my concerns with the current implementation. You did mention that you weren't a big fan of the name, I am not particularly attached to it either. If you (or anyone else) has better name in mind I would be happy to change it. ------=_Part_10873_25034849.1205982890851--