Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36199 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4765 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2008 22:02:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Mar 2008 22:02:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=foolistbar@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=foolistbar@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.159 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: foolistbar@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.14.220.159 fg-out-1718.google.com Received: from [72.14.220.159] ([72.14.220.159:46566] helo=fg-out-1718.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 23/F2-06623-40C30E74 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:02:45 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so100257fge.23 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.105.1 with SMTP id d1mr3181150buc.29.1205877760492; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.116? ( [86.138.199.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm17067179fkx.11.2008.03.18.15.02.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <12AD12B5-1C06-411F-9B08-3C9EC8189428@googlemail.com> To: Stephen Bach In-Reply-To: <200803181537.16247.stephen@stephenbach.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:02:36 +0000 References: <200803172351.12440.stephen@stephenbach.net> <47DFFF31.607@gravitonic.com> <200803181537.16247.stephen@stephenbach.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Bug 43477 - Unicode error mode ignored From: foolistbar@googlemail.com (Geoffrey Sneddon) On 18 Mar 2008, at 19:37, Stephen Bach wrote: > Shouldn't U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST work the same way? I guess: U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP is just U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST with the =20 substitution string as nothing, though I expect slight speed gains =20 could be made by keeping them separate (due to no attempt to even add =20= anything after coming across an invalid sequence =97 though the speed =20= gains will be very slight). -- Geoffrey Sneddon