Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36145 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29607 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2008 17:24:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2008 17:24:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:36722] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DF/28-09575-7C4BAD74 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:24:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (h1149922.serverkompetenz.net [85.214.94.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B7F11F0AD; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:24:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:24:15 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <21580745.20080314182415@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Pierre Joye" CC: "Hannes Magnusson" , "Dmitry Stogov" , "Andi Gutmans" , "Stas Malyshev" , phpxcache , In-Reply-To: References: <06B0D32C7A96544490D18AF653D6BDE5026BA333@il-ex1.zend.net> <7f3ed2c30803140306k41b126beo6993213de4e53afb@mail.gmail.com> <9210185810.20080314162244@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for opcode caches From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Pierre, yep, stupid me. I got confused by your wording :-) marcus Friday, March 14, 2008, 4:42:32 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: >> Hello Pierre, >> >> it is unused code that does not work as intended and causes trouble. And >> at leats it makes maintanance harder. So that is a very big reason to drop >> it. > Yes, I fully agree (you may have missed the "not" in my reply :-) > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org Best regards, Marcus