Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36121 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60033 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 12:11:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 12:11:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:5149] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 54/CB-34038-1F919D74 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:11:32 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C88503.699AD1F6" Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:11:46 +0200 Message-ID: <06B0D32C7A96544490D18AF653D6BDE5026BA13A@il-ex1.zend.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Delayed early binding patch Thread-Index: AciE8cuGYSuXla3VRbmVHQslb38jagAESMiA To: Cc: "internals" Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Delayed early binding patch From: dmitry@zend.com ("Dmitry Stogov") ------_=_NextPart_001_01C88503.699AD1F6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've attached two tests. BTW it mighr be hard to run them because opcode caches usually don't work in CLI mode. Thanks. Dmitry. > -----Original Message----- > From: Robin Fernandes [mailto:rewbs.soal@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:05 PM > To: Dmitry Stogov > Cc: internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Delayed early binding patch >=20 >=20 > Hi Dmitry, >=20 > On 13/03/2008, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > I have separated fixes and optimizations from the delayed early=20 > > binding itself and added comments about options. Now the=20 > patch must be=20 > > more clear. > > >=20 > Thanks, that's really interesting. > As mentioned on http://turl.ca/ynny, I'm wondering if there=20 > are already tests in CVS which illustrate the original issue=20 > when using opcode caches. If not, it seems it would be great=20 > to add such tests along with the patch! >=20 > Regards, > Robin >=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C88503.699AD1F6--