Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36047 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19668 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2008 15:19:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2008 15:19:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:46526] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/77-19009-FDC51D74 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:18:57 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564F66400F2; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:18:52 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47D15CCD.5080305@daylessday.org> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:18:37 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Beaver CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , PHP Internals List References: <1204823427.30934.9.camel@goldfinger.johannes.nop> <47D0ABE7.3010700@chiaraquartet.net> <47D10AB8.9090306@daylessday.org> <47D15C23.4020907@chiaraquartet.net> In-Reply-To: <47D15C23.4020907@chiaraquartet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 5.3 Release Planning From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 07.03.2008 18:15, Gregory Beaver wrote: > I wholeheartedly agree that phar needs more testing. I also think some > other areas of php could have used more testing Undoubtedly. >> And I'm still not convinced we should include any PECL extensions in the core, >> I believe it should go the other way round. > > This is secondary, but I'm proposing using phar to test the mechanism > that will allow ext/ to migrate to pecl/ and still work as it did in ext/ Ok, here I guess I should and read that thread Steph mentioned.. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal