Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:36037 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60195 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2008 09:37:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2008 09:37:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:58971] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 13/D8-16577-5CC01D74 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:37:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8085B6400F2; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:37:06 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47D10CB3.4070201@daylessday.org> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:36:51 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Zakhlestin CC: Gregory Beaver , =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8?= =?UTF-8?B?dGVy?= , PHP Internals List References: <1204823427.30934.9.camel@goldfinger.johannes.nop> <47D0ABE7.3010700@chiaraquartet.net> <47D10AB8.9090306@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 5.3 Release Planning From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 07.03.2008 12:32, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: >> I'm not sure it's good idea. >> IMO it should go trough much more thorough testing to be included into the core. >> >> And I'm still not convinced we should include any PECL extensions in the core, >> I believe it should go the other way round. > > it would be better to say not "in core", but "in official distribution" PECL is officially distributed either. What I mean by the "core" is ext/ subdirectory of the sources tarball. > until there is convenient cross-platform of installing extensions from > pecl, important ones should be included in distribution Well, lets make it convenient then. Including everything into the core is not a solution. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal