Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35942 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41124 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2008 09:53:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2008 09:53:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:36482] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/51-32207-B2C1DC74 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:53:47 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B396400F2; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:53:44 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47CD1C1A.8000004@daylessday.org> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:53:30 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: Andi Gutmans , internals@lists.php.net References: <1706278209.20080302232134@marcus-boerger.de> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE01506D08@us-ex1.zend.net> <1245060809.20080304103839@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <1245060809.20080304103839@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Replace the flex-based scanner with an re2c [1] based lexer From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 04.03.2008 12:38, Marcus Boerger wrote: > This sounds like we are going to do the same mistake over and over and over > again. Who is forcing a hard time line on us? Why are we late in the > develoment I don't get it at all. Right. Please take more time if needed, no need to rush and release something half-working. If it takes several months to prepare 5.3 release, let it be so. After all, we're not a commercial company that has to roll out a release every couple of months under pressure of share holders and overall competition. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal