Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35925 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2032 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2008 19:59:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Mar 2008 19:59:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.94.239.7 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.7 mail.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.94.239.7] ([82.94.239.7:39882] helo=mail.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D3/11-29055-4885CC74 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:59:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m23Jwu7I009732; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:58:56 +0100 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:58:58 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Stanislav Malyshev cc: Marcus Boerger , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <47CC4A9D.1080705@zend.com> Message-ID: References: <1706278209.20080302232134@marcus-boerger.de> <47CB2E9D.6010102@zend.com> <1642796941.20080303002651@marcus-boerger.de> <47CB8107.1090802@zend.com> <1207450994.20080303113313@marcus-boerger.de> <47CC4A9D.1080705@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Replace the flex-based scanner with an re2c [1] based lexer From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > 4. We expect people to upgrade from 5.2.x to 5.3.x without changing their > systems. > > Is it clearer why I think PHP 5.x and 6 are different and why I think ICU > dependency in the 5.3 core might be a problem? FWIW... I also think that bringing in ICU in 5.3 so late in the cycle - or actually at all in 5.3 - is not such a bright idea. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org