Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35880 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9655 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Mar 2008 20:07:53 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9640 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 20:07:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 20:07:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.190 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.190 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.190] ([209.85.198.190:23068] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/E4-08308-897B9C74 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:07:52 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so3271434rvb.23 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:07:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=fkBH1gEGa+dav7rHbKP7Us6ItndDRKlOLDyQ26eenKM=; b=X+xILYS+BWheSGnghnCDKx43lBlUFRWYYa2akyK0/aZzlomdY3BTDu23EAN5b3zRXAmHLNXbQ0G4u43yeVz6PUZjAa7LjLHtVsHze6s27n/nFGPLcIPS6wflv2j2g7Iv24Z7q+iz/v9zIgXcE2J7LO5c+w41kLB1W5JyeBBhzDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iGug9etOnMF5x6rgaTr2xxvePSJsYFe58+04vqP5bpwWEavihpe5eF2G3caWrCTRu5FddPY87uB/jE76fziH2wv1WTzfFmXynODpESg2W0fgEGuY1VaGciKOL/SQwCUZv3qclJdhmJKcbbeU9Nkj++MAsR3yTR9DIRz8t5loIaU= Received: by 10.141.1.2 with SMTP id d2mr7254345rvi.42.1204402069901; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.116.12 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:07:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 21:07:49 +0100 To: "Marcus Boerger" Cc: till , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1672609976.20080301210035@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <234b196e0803011115t31dd004iba76f5d7ac9125b8@mail.gmail.com> <1476108437.20080301203629@marcus-boerger.de> <1672609976.20080301210035@marcus-boerger.de> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.2.5 and static calls From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Pierre, > > Saturday, March 1, 2008, 8:53:26 PM, you wrote: > > and yeas after several years of trying to communicate and never gotten > anything back? I have told PREAR development a million times to fix code. I don't know PREAR and don't care about PEAR. This issues does not create troubles only for PEAR but to many applications out there, open sources or not. Users love to update to the next point release (often for security reason or crashes) and likes when their applications continue to work just like before. > Now not even PEAR code is wrong but it is copied into endless amounts of > code. So it seems ignorance is bliss is what our userbase is doing. So I > need to do the same, no? On the other hand Rasmus and I spent a lot time > getting this right without affecting users to much and we infact did > encounter things that lead to bigger issues and I am not introducing tons > of workarounds. Again, focusing on PEAR being does not matter. And again, I'm not arguing about the needs of fixing bugs but about pointless fatal errors introductions (or anything else higher than a notice) in point releases. I think it is understandable. Anyway, you know my opinion as we discussed this problem hundred of times already. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org