Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35877 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4857 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Mar 2008 19:53:35 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4842 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 19:53:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 19:53:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.190 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.190 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.190] ([209.85.198.190:51825] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F0/14-08308-D34B9C74 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:53:33 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so3266953rvb.23 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:53:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=py3DSMK2fi3GtPfZCLNmkB8DWmNlwyh1ssyoU7URT3A=; b=KEYq+fcr+A/H270f2EIuw5v+m60s6CP9h7LHv+CNw9z9weuuxxlYWtl+SZTkOU5Gq56lwkC11EJansJ9YKCkUljak1/A/9O/RHRkwqxohKTMYi/F8W4hDYvxBAICkjhQsXSTHuwd6aSwCf7IFZCjc8PeojvDUg25kfqXfZksouY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s9yDT5a9wYrIjSzAPB3ma5nMpGDpKPKbA44EWuLoUAFIXkmQBrEDmaM4Z5rr04gMwNmGdfkxJ04yiS6jFxM43Cj2tVBv2iSEPOjrpsJ6yZcbGX2Pad0UJ+GSQBRl1dUWYAE4KUOZKJ0twLJDYyGmzNyPzf8gO2UJVg5TO9AEZaU= Received: by 10.141.86.14 with SMTP id o14mr7230829rvl.278.1204401207230; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.116.12 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:53:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:53:26 +0100 To: "Marcus Boerger" Cc: till , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1476108437.20080301203629@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <234b196e0803011115t31dd004iba76f5d7ac9125b8@mail.gmail.com> <1476108437.20080301203629@marcus-boerger.de> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.2.5 and static calls From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") Hi Marco, On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello till, > > we changed the behavior as much back as we need be. Fact is that this has > been an oversight. It has been a bug we just fixed. As an eagreement we > decided not to mark all of these as fatal. We might do so in later versions. > However we have been mentioning this for years now. Fix the damn code. If > you are not willing to do so, then imo you should just stick with older > versions. On a case by case basis, the code may be fixed, we all agree on that. But this answer is not acceptable. Can you seriously ask someone to stick to versions with security fixes only because of our strictness breakages? I can accept (does not mean that I agree) a change to fatal between 5.2 to 5.3 for example- But it must not happen between two patches releases (I say must instead of should, as it is a must to do break code in this case). Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org